Re: [PATCH] mm/khugepaged: cap min_free_kbytes recommendation at 1 GiB
Nimrod Oren <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:19:44 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 29/07/2026 3:17, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 23:20:14 +0300 Nimrod Oren <[email protected]> wrote: >> Add an absolute 1 GiB cap to the recommendation, in addition to the >> existing percentage cap. This bounds the automatic recommendation to a >> sane value on systems with large pageblocks while preserving existing >> behavior for typical systems with 2 MiB pageblocks. > > Another hard-coded number isn't pretty :( The 1 GiB value follows the RFC discussion. Would a dedicated constant (e.g. THP_MIN_FREE_MAX_PAGES) make it better? Would using a new sysctl be preferable? >> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c >> index 27e8f3077e80..d9caf10e05b5 100644 >> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c >> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ >> #include <linux/ksm.h> >> #include <linux/pgalloc.h> >> #include <linux/backing-dev.h> >> +#include <linux/sizes.h> > > Why this? For SZ_1G. It's already included transitively, so I'll drop it in the next revision. >> #include <asm/tlb.h> >> #include "internal.h" >> @@ -3096,9 +3097,13 @@ void set_recommended_min_free_kbytes(void) >> recommended_min += pageblock_nr_pages * nr_zones * >> MIGRATE_PCPTYPES * MIGRATE_PCPTYPES; >> >> - /* don't ever allow to reserve more than 5% of the lowmem */ >> + /* >> + * Don't ever allow to reserve more than 5% of lowmem or 1 GiB, >> + * whichever is smaller. >> + */ >> recommended_min = min(recommended_min, >> (unsigned long) nr_free_buffer_pages() / 20); >> + recommended_min = min(recommended_min, SZ_1G / PAGE_SIZE); >> recommended_min <<= (PAGE_SHIFT-10); >> >> if (recommended_min > min_free_kbytes) { > > Is a min_free_kbytes documentation update needed? > Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/vm.rst. I can document THP's automatic recommendation there in the next revision, along with whichever capping mechanism we decide on. Thanks for the review!