Re: [PATCH v2] fork: Honor task_struct's declared alignment
"Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 09:45:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/4/26 08:40, Karl Mehltretter wrote:
> Since commit cb7ca40a3882 ("x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant
> size"), struct task_struct is declared __attribute__((aligned(64))) on
> all architectures.
>
> But fork_init() sets the task_struct slab cache's alignment to
>
> align = max(L1_CACHE_BYTES, ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN)
>
> which is smaller than 64 on architectures whose cache lines are below
> 64 bytes: e.g. 32 on ARMv5.
>
> In practice plain SLUB happens to hand out 64-byte-aligned objects
> anyway. With CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON the red-zone padding shifts objects
> to the requested alignment.
>
> With CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT=y a boot on QEMU versatilepb (ARM926EJ-S,
> v7.2-rc2, gcc 13.3) floods the console with reports like:
>
> UBSAN: misaligned-access in include/linux/sched.h:2087:9
> member access within misaligned address c295d7e0 for type 'struct task_struct'
> which requires 64 byte alignment
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 15 Comm: pr/ttyAMA-1 Not tainted 7.2.0-rc2 #1 VOLUNTARY
>
> Set the slab alignment to at least the type's declared alignment.
> Replace the hardcoded L1_CACHE_BYTES with SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN so the
> allocator applies cache_line_size(). On x86, arm and arm64 that is the
> cache line size of the booted CPU. Everywhere else it falls back to
> L1_CACHE_BYTES and nothing changes. ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN (e.g. 4096 with
> x86 VSMP) still applies through the explicit align argument.
>
> Fixes: cb7ca40a3882 ("x86/fpu: Make task_struct::thread constant size")
> Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <[email protected]>
Thanks but I suggested only SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, not the whole thing :) Can
be removed when a maintainer applies this.
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Notes (format-patch):
> v2:
> - fold in Vlastimil's suggestion: let SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN replace the
> hardcoded L1_CACHE_BYTES
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> kernel/fork.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index f0e2e131a9a5..3a0093efb29f 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -857,14 +857,15 @@ void __init fork_init(void)
> #ifndef ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN
> #define ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN 0
> #endif
> - int align = max_t(int, L1_CACHE_BYTES, ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN);
> + int align = max(ARCH_MIN_TASKALIGN,
> + __alignof__(struct task_struct));
> unsigned long useroffset, usersize;
>
> /* create a slab on which task_structs can be allocated */
> task_struct_whitelist(&useroffset, &usersize);
> task_struct_cachep = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("task_struct",
> arch_task_struct_size, align,
> - SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT,
> + SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT|SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
> useroffset, usersize, NULL);
>
> /* do the arch specific task caches init */
>
> base-commit: af5e34a41cd607c00ef752e00331736570992354