Re: [PATCH] mm: pull writability check to follow_pfnmap_start()

On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 10:55=E2=80=AFAM David Hildenbrand (Arm)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > index 485df9c2dbdd..34c79b5fcb9b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -3136,9 +3136,12 @@ struct follow_pfnmap_args {
> >        * Inputs:
> >        * @vma: Pointer to @vm_area_struct struct
> >        * @address: the virtual address to walk
> > +      * @write_fault: if true, fail with -EFAULT unless the mapping is
>
> Just wondering whether EPERM would be better.

I considered EACCES, but EFAULT seems more appropriate: it's already
what most callers return, and vm_fault_to_errno() never returns
EACCES.

> > +      * writable
> >        */
> >       struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> >       unsigned long address;
> > +     bool write_fault;
>
> "write_fault" is a rather odd name for this, given that this function wil=
l not
> trigger a write fault.
>
> You want something that matches FOLL_WRITE.
>
> "write_access" / "check_writable" maybe?

Just "write" is what mm/ uses for local variables so I'll use that here too=
.

Paolo