Re: [PATCH v2] alloc_tag: fix undetected compressed tag overflow when profiling is disabled

Hao Ge <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 2026/8/5 03:43, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue,  4 Aug 2026 20:20:38 +0800 Hao Ge <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> In reserve_module_tags(), the tag overflow check is gated on
>> mem_alloc_profiling_enabled():
>>
>>      if (mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() && !tags_addressable())
>>
>> If profiling is toggled off at runtime and a module is loaded whose
>> tags exceed the compressed-mode limit, shutdown_mem_profiling() is
>> skipped. vm_module_tags_populate() still maps memory for the tags and
>> the module loads successfully, but the total tag count now exceeds what
>> NR_UNUSED_PAGEFLAG_BITS can address.
>>
>> Once profiling is re-enabled, ref_to_idx() computes each tag's index
>> as its position in the alloc_tag array. update_page_tag_ref() masks
>> it to alloc_tag_ref_mask before storing in page->flags. Indices
>> beyond the mask are truncated and idx_to_ref() resolves them to wrong
>> tags.
>>
>> mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() and mem_profiling_compressed are
>> independent. Once compressed mode is established at boot, it stays
>> active regardless of runtime toggles of mem_profiling.
>>
>> Remove the mem_alloc_profiling_enabled() guard. Also return an error
>> after shutdown_mem_profiling() to skip vm_module_tags_populate(), as
>> the mapped pages would never be reused - shutdown_mem_profiling() sets
>> mem_profiling_support to false, so no future module load enters the
>> codetag path.
> 
> Thanks.  Sashiko pointed at a few things, one pre-existing.
> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]
> 
> Is there any sanity in there?
Hi Andrew

Thanks for pointing these out.
I went through all the Sashiko feedback from v1 and v2.
Most of what it flagged is pre-existing and I'll fix it separately.
The only point that actually touches this patch is the -ENOMEM failing 
the first load. Between wasting a few KB of tag memory to let the load 
succeed and returning -ENOMEM so the user just reloads the module once,
I prefer the latter: a re-insmod works because the codetag section is 
skipped once profiling is off, whereas those mapped tag pages would 
never be used or reclaimed.

Thanks
Best Regards
Hao
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.