Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio_balloon: add VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING_PM_SAFE feature bit

Link Lin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <CALUx4KS-xRf7m3jPDN5BKfFrpbojp9+0czRp5-siFed-Jj1G1A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all,

Following up on this RFC to see if anyone has had a chance to look it over.

We'd appreciate any high-level feedback on whether using a dedicated feature
bit (or a similar protocol-level handshake) is a viable path forward for
safe hypervisor deployment, or if there is an alternative approach the
maintainers would prefer.

Thanks,
Link


On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 7:52 PM Link Lin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping on this RFC.
>
> We'd love your feedback on whether using a new feature bit
> (VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING_PM_SAFE) to negotiate PM suspend safety is
> acceptable, or if you have concerns about protocol-level handshakes for
> kernel PM fix states.
>
> If you prefer an alternative approach for safe fleet deployment, please let
> us know. Thank you!
>
> Sincerely,
> Link
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.