Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: fail the fault on a malformed swap entry instead of retrying it

Barry Song <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Message-ID <CAGsJ_4y7kQmZpfPQo8n5wRD2syHRj21XPvi6+OjVm_cXbfDLQQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 6:02 PM Breno Leitao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> do_swap_page() returns 0 when get_swap_device() fails, which the fault
> handler reads as "handled". For an entry that can never become valid
> the retry takes the same fault again, so the thread spins forever,
> retrying on the same fault.
>
> Return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS (Bad access) for a malformed entry (pr_err() was
> called at get_swap_device()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 7201e848129a7..fa2b3d2ad3202 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4957,6 +4957,9 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>         /* Prevent swapoff from happening to us, and reject a bad entry. */
>         si = get_swap_device(entry);
>         if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(si)) {
> +               /* A malformed entry never becomes valid, so don't retry it. */
> +               if (IS_ERR(si))
> +                       ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;


Hi Breno,

Since you now return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, the page fault should no
longer retry repeatedly. Do we still need patch 1/3, which adds the
rate-limited printk?

Best Regards
Barry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.