Re: LiS and Linux 2.6 (SuSE 9.1 and SuSE 9.2)
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.streams |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.openss7.org/ |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
dan_gora, You might try the upcoming 2.18.1 release. It works nicely on SuSE. --brian On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, dan_gora wrote: > Hi All... > > John Boyd, > > I was reading on the list archive that you did some work with porting > LiS to kernel versions in the 2.6 range. > > 1) Is the work that you did captured in the last release, LiS 2.18.0? > > 2) Is it only in LiS 2.17.K? > > 3) Did you ever do anything with posting your changes to Sourceforge? > (there was one thread where you mentioned that you were going to post > your changes and more to a project on Sourceforge.) > > I am being charged with getting LiS working on linux 2.6, > specifically SuSE 9.1 and SuSE 9.2 for our company's products and > would like to avoid repeating other people's work if at all possible. > Of course we'd be willing to post our changes once we are done so > that everyone doesn't have to suffer through the same thing now that > it seems that all "official" developement has ceased. > > Speaking of official developement, what exactly is going on with LiS > nowdays? Dave, did you turn over "source manager" duties to someone? > What exactly happens at this point? Can anyone decree themselves the > holder of the "offical" tree? > > I have a few changes that I did to LiS 2.18.0 to improve the > performance a bit on SMP systems, but frankly I don't know what to do > with them. I don't really want to just post them as a set of patches > to the mailing list... That seems kind of klunky. Should we start a > sourceforge site for LiS so that everyone has a place to centralize > the discussion and changes now that Dave has bowed out? > > thanks- > dan > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-streams mailing list > [email protected] > http://gsyc.escet.urjc.es/mailman/listinfo/linux-streams -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ [email protected] ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦