Re: Testers needed for LTTng 0.6.0pre1

"Christopher Yeoh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.tracing
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 2006/9/27 15:54-0400  Mathieu Desnoyers writes:
> 
> I would like you to test it on various architectures (and check for warnings) to
> see if I broke something when porting the LTTng instrumentation to markers.

The marker mechanism doesn't compile on ppc64. Neither the asm-powerpc
or asm-generic version of marker.h work.

The problem appears to be in the macro:

		asm volatile(	".section .markers, \"a\";\n\t" \
					".long %1, 0f, %2, %3;\n\t" \
					".previous;\n\t" \
					".align 32;\n\t" \
					"0:\n\t" \
					"li $0,%0;\n\t" \
				: "=r" (condition) : \
				"m" (*(#name)), \
				"m" (__mark_call_##name), \
				"m" (*format)); \

For the .long part, gcc ends up outputting something like:

long 0(9), 0f, 0(11), 0(3);

ie register relative addresses which the assembler barfs on.

Would something like the following be ok? (based on asm-generic version
- I did try to do get something working based on the asm-powerpc
version working, but so far without success):

#define MARK(name, format, args...) \
        do { \
                static marker_probe_func *__mark_call_##name = \
                                        __mark_empty_function; \
                volatile static char __marker_enable_##name = 0; \
                static struct _mark_marker_local { \
                        const char *local_name; \
                        volatile char *enable; \
                        marker_probe_func **call; \
                        const char *local_format; \
                } __attribute__((packed)) i __attribute__ ((section(".markers"))) \
		 __attribute__((__used__))  = \
                    { #name, &__marker_enable_##name, &__mark_call_##name, format }; \
                if (unlikely(__marker_enable_##name)) { \
                        preempt_disable(); \
                        (*__mark_call_##name)(format, ## args); \
                        preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
                } \
        } while(0)


There also seems to be a problem with fs/compat.c (~1514) with lttng_name
not being declared.

Chris
-- 
[email protected]
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group, ADL
Canberra, Australia
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.