Re: [PATCH 3/16] LTTng 0.6.36 for 2.6.18 : Linux Kernel Markers

Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.tracing,gmane.linux.systemtap
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:33:50PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Frank Ch. Eigler ([email protected]) wrote:
> > One question:
> > 
> > > [...]
> > > +	/* Markers in modules. */ 
> > > +	list_for_each_entry(mod, &modules, list) {
> > > +		if (mod->license_gplok)
> > > +			found += marker_set_probe_range(name, format, probe,
> > > +				mod->markers, mod->markers+mod->num_markers);
> > > +	}
> > > [...]
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(marker_set_probe);
> > 
> > Are you sure the license_gplok check is necessary here?  We should
> > consider encouraging non-gpl module writers to instrument their code,
> > to give users a slightly better chance of debugging problems.
> > 
> 
> Hi Frank,
> 
> I was kind of expecting this question. Well, it turns out that my markers module
> modifies the struct module in module.h to add a few fields. Some drivers that I
> won't name (ok, ok I will : clearcase) have the funny habit of distributing
> their kernel modules as ".ko" files instead of sending a proper ".o" and later
> link it against a wrapper.
> 
> The result is, I must say, quite bad : when I want to add a probe, I iterate on
> each modules, verifying if there are any markers in the object. Things gets
> really messy when the structure is corrupted.
> 
> The simplest way to work around this non-GPL problem is to completely disable
> access to the marker infrastructure to non-GPL modules. I am not against
> instrumentation of binary-only modules, but I don't think it is kernel
> developer's job to support their broken binary blob distribution.
> 
> I thought that we might use the crc checksum as another criterion. As long as
> the machines do not crash when adding markers when such modules are loaded.

Please don't add hacks like that for non-GPL modules.  But neither
should we export any tracing functionality for them.  They;re not the
kind of people we want to help at all, and Frank just shows once again that
he should rather stay away from kernel stuff and keep on writing C++.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.