Re: [PATCH 1/2] atomic.h atomic64_t standardization

Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.systemtap,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.tracing
Message-ID <20061201034143.GA11388@Krystal>
* Paul Mundt ([email protected]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:11:53PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
> [snip]
> > +#if 0
> > +/* Atomic add unless is only effective on atomic_t on powerpc (at least) */
> > +static inline long atomic_long_add_unless(atomic_long_t *l, long a, long u)
> > +{
> > +	atomic_t *v = (atomic_t *)l;
> > +	
> > +	return atomic_add_unless(v, a, u);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline long atomic_long_inc_not_zero(atomic_long_t *l)
> > +{
> > +	atomic_t *v = (atomic_t *)l;
> > +	
> > +	return atomic_inc_not_zero(v);
> > +}
> > +#endif //0
> > +
> 
> Why is this in the patch?
> 

Oops, I forgot to remove these comments after I fixed it in the powerpc code.
Code for all other architectures will have to modified too : I just modified
i386, x86_64, mips, arm and powerpc.

Thanks for reporting.

Mathieu


Here is the fix :


--- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
@@ -122,22 +122,19 @@ static inline long atomic_long_dec_retur
 	return atomic64_dec_return(v);
 }
 
-#if 0
-/* Atomic add unless is only effective on atomic_t on powerpc (at least) */
 static inline long atomic_long_add_unless(atomic_long_t *l, long a, long u)
 {
-	atomic_t *v = (atomic_t *)l;
+	atomic64_t *v = (atomic64_t *)l;
 	
-	return atomic_add_unless(v, a, u);
+	return atomic64_add_unless(v, a, u);
 }
 
 static inline long atomic_long_inc_not_zero(atomic_long_t *l)
 {
-	atomic_t *v = (atomic_t *)l;
+	atomic64_t *v = (atomic64_t *)l;
 	
-	return atomic_inc_not_zero(v);
+	return atomic64_inc_not_zero(v);
 }
-#endif //0
 
 #else
 


OpenPGP public key:              http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg
Key fingerprint:     8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.