Re: Re: [PATCH 05/05] Linux Kernel Markers, non optimized architectures
Karim Yaghmour <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.systemtap,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.tracing |
|---|---|
| Organization | Kryptiva Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
----- KRYPTIVA PACKAGED MESSAGE ----- PACKAGING TYPE: SIGNED Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > The main goal of this config option is for embedded systems which doesn't support live code modification. Maybe we can put that under "embedded sytems" menu ? Not sure whether you had had other feedback on this elsewhere in the rest of the thread, but yes, this would make sense if the "embedded" angle is the only reason we need this (and not, say, performance, etc.) Also, having done that, maybe it would make some sense to have it be a "disable" rather than "enable": CONFIG_MARKERS_DISABLE_OPTIMIZATION? Karim ----- KRYPTIVA SIGNED MESSAGE ----- This email claims to have been packaged by Kryptiva. To process this email and authenticate its origin, get the free plugin from: http://www.kryptiva.com/downloads ----- KRYPTIVA SIGNATURE START ----- AvWVqAAAAAIAAAABAAAAAAAATiACAQAAAAC3AQAIAAAAAgAAAAECABTXxT4xHdR4/1uU1hL2 +TaPrqNB0wMAFNa8GHXZWJH5Dz+D76vfh6JhvWLvBAAUpuIZcCAkCC+ldyaBuoAWxK50HiQF ABRI38gc/foDHQsS6X3W0VP4xTukBwYAFDzvzh+u6zVtolglAZrnE7FOmtZDBwAUTxyTas6N WLapdnSnAwVHeC06/ioRABgAAAAAAABOIEXWD8AACTdnAAAAAAAAAN8TAAQAAAAAAAAAggP+ K8Gk1SWj+c67jiJerodkr1gntoa9dJVVN6InxB824CfKC6flE4JMWtffw0Dxh0cJ8iOQ8UeC zoWzTs9Z+K9j1CL11CHkIIit3RK3hnfnby6whr4xoZ9UX/BUUv8FVKZeyRg7SbDKlhEZTwIH 7axjVQJ6MGU7h+0/5dKCDMEtzPY= ----- KRYPTIVA SIGNATURE END -----