Re: LTTng for ST40 kernel 2.6.23.1

* Giuseppe Cavallaro ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> I was able to apply, into the kernel 2.6.23.1, the
> patch-2.6.23-mm1-lttng-0.10-pre14 (plus missing markers came from MM1
> development).
> Building the kernel, I have met the same issue reported last month about the
> TSC.
> IIUW, we should use ltt_read_synthetic_tsc instead of
> ltt_heartbeat_read_synthetic_tsc
> in include/asm-sh/ltt.h:ltt_get_timestamp64 because now the TSC support
> cames from ltt-timestamp instead of heartbeat.
> Is it true?
> Please, welcome advice.
> 
> Regards,
> Giuseppe
> 
> On 09/11/2007, Giuseppe Cavallaro <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mathieu,
> > last month, you suggested me to use, for my kernel 2.6.23.1, the following
> > LTTng
> > patch-2.6.23-mm1-lttng-0.10-pre9 plus a subset of Andrew's 2.6.23-mm1patch for mm1.
> > So I'm working on that!
> > Now, I'm wondering if it's worth using an new LTTng version (
> > patch-2.6.23-mm1-lttng-0.10-pre14 or 16 ????).
> >
> > Welcome advice.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Giuseppe
> >

Yes, exactly. It is already in my patchset for the next release. This is
exactly what you should change.

Mathieu

> _______________________________________________
> Ltt-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listserv.shafik.org/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68