Re: linux 2.6.22.7

Hi,
yet to get a reply but adding on what all i tried.

I looked at
http://listserv.shafik.org/pipermail/ltt-dev/2006-July/001619.html as i am
also trying to get it run in a target.

and tried creating the header files using genevent only for arch_arm.xml.
But on trying to build the kernel i get some undefined references which are
mentioned below:
1) ltt_get_index_from_facility_kernel_arch.
2) ltt_facility_kernel_arch_E2D841CD.

Where are these function defined. Am i using a wrong version of genevent?

Thanks,
Karthik



On 12/18/07, karthikeyan. s <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi again,
> Followed the instructions as such from quickstart guide. By the way, i
> have an arm core here.
>
> ltt-control-0.43-10082007
> lttv --> 0.8.82
> lttng patch --> 0.9.5
>
> Here is the message form dmesg
> LTT : ltt-facilities init
> LTT : Facility kernel_arch registered with id 86
> LTT : Facility kernel registered with id 211
> LTT unable to register probe kernel_sched_wait_task
> LTT unable to register probe kernel_sched_migrate_task
> LTT : Facility list registered with id 145
> LTT : ltt-relay init
> ltt-control init
> LTT : ltt-facility-statedump init
>
> ltt-control ltt_control_input
> ltt_control : trace trace
> Creating trace trace
> ltt-control ltt_control_input
> ltt_control : trace trace
> Start tracing trace
> Dumping facility kernel_arch
> Dumping facility list
> Dumping facility kernel
> ltt_statedump_start
> do_ltt_statedump
> do_ltt_statedump end
> ----
> ltt-control ltt_control_input
> ltt_control : trace trace
> Stop tracing trace
> ltt-control ltt_control_input
> ltt_control : trace trace
> Destroying trace trace
> LTT : cpu : 22954 events lost in cpu channel (cpu 0).
> --------
> When i run textdump
>
> lttv -m textDump -t /tmp/trace
>
> I get
> ---
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> /control/network
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> /control/processes
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> /control/modules
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> /control/interrupts
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> /cpu
> Trace set contains 1 traces
>
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> /control/network
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> /control/processes
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> /control/modules
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> /control/interrupts
>
> ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> /cpu
>
> ** ERROR **: file event.c: line 86 (ltt_event_facility): assertion failed:
> (facility->exists)
> aborting...
> /usr/local/bin/lttv: line 15: 25057 Aborted                 $0.real $*
> ------
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> karthik
>
> On 12/17/07, karthikeyan. s <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi mathieu,
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >
> > I patched the 2.6.22.7 kernel with 2.6.21 patch.Patching was not an
> > issue but getting it to run is a problem. And i did not have to get any file
> > from the 2.6.22-mm* patches (most probable cause? ).
> >
> > Should I take a 2.6.22 or 2.6.23 patch and sort things out or use 2.6.21and go ahead?
> >
> > Thanks again!
> > karthik
> >
> >
> > On Nov 16, 2007 7:36 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >  * karthikeyan.s ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I am required to use 2.6.22.7 kernel.
> > > >
> > > > There are a bunch of patches available. But none seem to be for the
> > > mainline
> > > > kernel.
> > > >
> > > > Can you please suggest which patch to use, as i have already
> > > suffered a lot
> > > > on using a patch and reverting back a number of times
> > > >
> > > > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
> > > > 2.6.22-rc4-mm2
> > > > 2.6.22.1-rt4
> > > > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
> > > >
> > >
> > > There is no LTTng specifically for 2.6.22, a port will be needed.
> > > (which
> > > means fixing the rejects, grabbing some files from the -mm patches...)
> > >
> > >
> > > Mathieu
> > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > -karthik
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Ltt-dev mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://listserv.shafik.org/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > > Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
> > > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE
> > > 9A68
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---
> > S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
> > ---
>
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
> ---




-- 
---
S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
---

_______________________________________________
Ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.shafik.org/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev