Re: linux 2.6.22.7

* karthikeyan.s ([email protected]) wrote:
> Hi,
> yet to get a reply but adding on what all i tried.
> 
> I looked at
> http://listserv.shafik.org/pipermail/ltt-dev/2006-July/001619.html as i am
> also trying to get it run in a target.
> 
> and tried creating the header files using genevent only for arch_arm.xml.
> But on trying to build the kernel i get some undefined references which are
> mentioned below:
> 1) ltt_get_index_from_facility_kernel_arch.
> 2) ltt_facility_kernel_arch_E2D841CD.
> 
> Where are these function defined. Am i using a wrong version of genevent?
> 

genevent should only be needed on these old LTTng versions when you want
to add new events. The packaged lttng should not require genevent.

And in newer LTTng version, genevent is deprecated and not used anymore.

Mathieu

> Thanks,
> Karthik
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/18/07, karthikeyan. s <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi again,
> > Followed the instructions as such from quickstart guide. By the way, i
> > have an arm core here.
> >
> > ltt-control-0.43-10082007
> > lttv --> 0.8.82
> > lttng patch --> 0.9.5
> >
> > Here is the message form dmesg
> > LTT : ltt-facilities init
> > LTT : Facility kernel_arch registered with id 86
> > LTT : Facility kernel registered with id 211
> > LTT unable to register probe kernel_sched_wait_task
> > LTT unable to register probe kernel_sched_migrate_task
> > LTT : Facility list registered with id 145
> > LTT : ltt-relay init
> > ltt-control init
> > LTT : ltt-facility-statedump init
> >
> > ltt-control ltt_control_input
> > ltt_control : trace trace
> > Creating trace trace
> > ltt-control ltt_control_input
> > ltt_control : trace trace
> > Start tracing trace
> > Dumping facility kernel_arch
> > Dumping facility list
> > Dumping facility kernel
> > ltt_statedump_start
> > do_ltt_statedump
> > do_ltt_statedump end
> > ----
> > ltt-control ltt_control_input
> > ltt_control : trace trace
> > Stop tracing trace
> > ltt-control ltt_control_input
> > ltt_control : trace trace
> > Destroying trace trace
> > LTT : cpu : 22954 events lost in cpu channel (cpu 0).
> > --------
> > When i run textdump
> >
> > lttv -m textDump -t /tmp/trace
> >
> > I get
> > ---
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> > /control/network
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> > /control/processes
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> > /control/modules
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> > /control/interrupts
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> > /cpu
> > Trace set contains 1 traces
> >
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> > /control/network
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> > /control/processes
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> > /control/modules
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 145 (0x91) in tracefile
> > /control/interrupts
> >
> > ** (process:25057): WARNING **: Unknown facility 211 (0xd3) in tracefile
> > /cpu
> >
> > ** ERROR **: file event.c: line 86 (ltt_event_facility): assertion failed:
> > (facility->exists)
> > aborting...
> > /usr/local/bin/lttv: line 15: 25057 Aborted                 $0.real $*
> > ------
> >
> > Any help is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > karthik
> >
> > On 12/17/07, karthikeyan. s <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi mathieu,
> > > Thanks for the reply.
> > >
> > > I patched the 2.6.22.7 kernel with 2.6.21 patch.Patching was not an
> > > issue but getting it to run is a problem. And i did not have to get any file
> > > from the 2.6.22-mm* patches (most probable cause? ).
> > >
> > > Should I take a 2.6.22 or 2.6.23 patch and sort things out or use 2.6.21and go ahead?
> > >
> > > Thanks again!
> > > karthik
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 16, 2007 7:36 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >  * karthikeyan.s ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I am required to use 2.6.22.7 kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are a bunch of patches available. But none seem to be for the
> > > > mainline
> > > > > kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you please suggest which patch to use, as i have already
> > > > suffered a lot
> > > > > on using a patch and reverting back a number of times
> > > > >
> > > > > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
> > > > > 2.6.22-rc4-mm2
> > > > > 2.6.22.1-rt4
> > > > > 2.6.22-rc2-mm1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > There is no LTTng specifically for 2.6.22, a port will be needed.
> > > > (which
> > > > means fixing the rejects, grabbing some files from the -mm patches...)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mathieu
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > -karthik
> > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Ltt-dev mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://listserv.shafik.org/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > > > Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
> > > > OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE
> > > > 9A68
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > ---
> > > S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
> > > ---
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---
> > S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
> > ---
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ---
> S. Karthikeyan | +919980814745
> ---

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68