Re: [PATCH] HID: ft260: fix stack-use-after-return write in I2C read race

Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.i2c,gmane.linux.kernel.input,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.stable
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 10 Jun 2026, Raman Varabets wrote:

> ft260_i2c_read() points dev->read_buf at a caller-supplied buffer
> (often an on-stack variable), arms a completion and waits up to five
> seconds for the device to return the data. The HID input callback
> ft260_raw_event() runs in the input/IRQ path, independent of the
> dev->lock mutex held by the read path, and copies the device-supplied
> payload into dev->read_buf after a plain NULL check.
> 
> These two paths share read_buf, read_idx and read_len with no
> serialization. If the device delays its response until the read
> times out, ft260_i2c_read() resets the controller, clears read_buf
> and returns, unwinding the stack frame the buffer lived in. A
> response that arrives at that moment lets ft260_raw_event() pass the
> NULL check and then memcpy() the device-controlled payload into the
> now-freed stack location, a bounded but attacker-influenced
> stack-use-after-return write triggerable by malicious or
> malfunctioning hardware.
> 
> Add a dedicated spinlock that serializes every access to read_buf,
> read_idx and read_len. ft260_raw_event() now holds it across the
> NULL check, the memcpy and the index update, while the read path
> takes it when arming and when clearing the buffer, so the teardown
> can no longer slip between the check and the copy.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.