[PATCH v2] sched/numa: avoid doubling scan period for remote private faults

update_task_scan_period() currently uses local + shared to determine
whether there were any relevant memory faults. This incorrectly treats
a workload with only remote private faults as having no faults:

        local = 0
        shared = 0
        remote > 0

As a result, the NUMA scan period is unconditionally doubled.

Use local + remote for the no-fault check so that remote private faults
continue through the locality-ratio calculation. This does not necessarily
make the scan period shorter. For a pure private workload, ps_ratio reaches
NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS and the ratio logic still increases the scan period.
However, it avoids the unconditional doubling and lets the normal policy
determine the adjustment.

Also fix the comments for ps_ratio and lr_ratio, which described the
opposite ratios.

Suggested-by: Zhan Xusheng <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <[email protected]>

---
Changes from v1:
- Corrected commit message to remove incorrect "speed up" claim
- Changed patch title to accurately reflect the behavioral change
- Removed stale comment in lr_ratio branch about shared memory
- Added scan period comparison for clarity
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 37001c63452e..78f8dc4cf5ea 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3505,9 +3505,13 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
 	 * completely idle or all activity is in areas that are not of interest
 	 * to automatic numa balancing. Related to that, if there were failed
 	 * migration then it implies we are migrating too quickly or the local
-	 * node is overloaded. In either case, scan slower
+	 * node is overloaded. In either case, scan slower.
+	 *
+	 * Slow down if there are no actual memory faults (local + remote == 0),
+	 * or if previous migrations failed. Otherwise, use the locality ratios
+	 * to decide whether the scan rate should be adjusted.
 	 */
-	if (local + shared == 0 || p->numa_faults_locality[2]) {
+	if (local + remote == 0 || p->numa_faults_locality[2]) {
 		p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max,
 			p->numa_scan_period << 1);
 
@@ -3529,8 +3533,8 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
 
 	if (ps_ratio >= NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD) {
 		/*
-		 * Most memory accesses are local. There is no need to
-		 * do fast NUMA scanning, since memory is already local.
+		 * Most memory accesses are private. Slow down NUMA scanning
+		 * since there is little shared memory to rebalance.
 		 */
 		int slot = ps_ratio - NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD;
 		if (!slot)
@@ -3538,9 +3542,8 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
 		diff = slot * period_slot;
 	} else if (lr_ratio >= NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD) {
 		/*
-		 * Most memory accesses are shared with other tasks.
-		 * There is no point in continuing fast NUMA scanning,
-		 * since other tasks may just move the memory elsewhere.
+		 * Most memory accesses are local. There is no need to
+		 * do fast NUMA scanning, since memory is already local.
 		 */
 		int slot = lr_ratio - NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD;
 		if (!slot)
-- 
2.25.1