[PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Account for preempt and IRQ state in RCU protection
Ning Ding <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.bpf,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Disabling preemption or local IRQs keeps the current CPU in an RCU read-side critical section, but in_rcu_cs() does not account for either state. The verifier therefore rejects safe kptr accesses and invalidates pointers when another RCU source ends. Include preemption-disabled and IRQ-disabled state in in_rcu_cs(). Invalidate RCU-protected pointers on RCU unlock, preempt enable, or IRQ restore only after the final protection ends. Signed-off-by: Ning Ding <[email protected]> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d925197c2e5f7..a1005783db300 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4452,8 +4452,9 @@ static bool in_sleepable(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) static bool in_rcu_cs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { return env->cur_state->active_rcu_locks || - env->cur_state->active_locks || - !in_sleepable(env); + env->cur_state->active_irq_id || + env->cur_state->active_preempt_locks || + env->cur_state->active_locks || !in_sleepable(env); } /* Once GCC supports btf_type_tag the following mechanism will be replaced with tag check */ @@ -11663,6 +11664,9 @@ static int process_irq_flag(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state * err = unmark_stack_slot_irq_flag(env, reg, kfunc_class); if (err) return err; + + if (!in_rcu_cs(env)) + invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(env); } return 0; } @@ -13181,7 +13185,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, verbose(env, "unmatched rcu read unlock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name); return -EINVAL; } - if (--env->cur_state->active_rcu_locks == 0) + env->cur_state->active_rcu_locks--; + if (!in_rcu_cs(env)) invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(env); } else if (preempt_disable) { env->cur_state->active_preempt_locks++; @@ -13191,6 +13196,8 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, return -EINVAL; } env->cur_state->active_preempt_locks--; + if (!in_rcu_cs(env)) + invalidate_rcu_protected_refs(env); } if (sleepable && !in_sleepable_context(env)) { -- 2.43.0