Re: [PATCH v3] media: bcm2835-unicam: Fix log status runtime access

Eugen Hristev <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure,gmane.linux.kernel.rpi,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 6/11/26 20:34, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 08:18:10PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>> On 6/11/26 11:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 08:29:55AM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>>> When requesting log status, the block might be powered off, but registers
>>>> are being read.
>>>> Avoid reading the registers if the device is not resumed, thus also avoid
>>>> powering up the device just for log status.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 392cd78d495f ("media: bcm2835-unicam: Add support for CCP2/CSI2 camera interface")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - Changed to check return value of pm_runtime_get_if_active() and only call
>>>>   pm_runtime_put() if the device is active.
>>>> - Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - changed to use pm_runtime_get_if_active()
>>>> - add corresponding put()
>>>> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To: Raspberry Pi Kernel Maintenance <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Ray Jui <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Scott Branden <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Broadcom internal kernel review list <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Jean-Michel Hautbois <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Naushir Patuck <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Dave Stevenson <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/media/platform/broadcom/bcm2835-unicam.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/broadcom/bcm2835-unicam.c b/drivers/media/platform/broadcom/bcm2835-unicam.c
>>>> index 8d28ba0b59a3..96b51e29bba4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/broadcom/bcm2835-unicam.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/broadcom/bcm2835-unicam.c
>>>> @@ -2043,6 +2043,7 @@ static int unicam_log_status(struct file *file, void *fh)
>>>>  	struct unicam_node *node = video_drvdata(file);
>>>>  	struct unicam_device *unicam = node->dev;
>>>>  	u32 reg;
>>>> +	int pm_active;
>>>>  
>>>>  	/* status for sub devices */
>>>>  	v4l2_device_call_all(&unicam->v4l2_dev, 0, core, log_status);
>>>> @@ -2052,6 +2053,14 @@ static int unicam_log_status(struct file *file, void *fh)
>>>>  		 node->fmt.fmt.pix.width, node->fmt.fmt.pix.height);
>>>>  	dev_info(unicam->dev, "V4L2 format:         %08x\n",
>>>>  		 node->fmt.fmt.pix.pixelformat);
>>>> +
>>>> +	pm_active = pm_runtime_get_if_active(unicam->dev);
>>>> +	if (!pm_active) {
>>>> +		dev_info(unicam->dev,
>>>> +			 "Live data N/A due to device inactive\n");
>>>> +		return 0;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>>  	reg = unicam_reg_read(unicam, UNICAM_IPIPE);
>>>>  	dev_info(unicam->dev, "Unpacking/packing:   %u / %u\n",
>>>>  		 unicam_get_field(reg, UNICAM_PUM_MASK),
>>>> @@ -2065,6 +2074,9 @@ static int unicam_log_status(struct file *file, void *fh)
>>>>  	dev_info(unicam->dev, "Write pointer:       %08x\n",
>>>>  		 unicam_reg_read(unicam, UNICAM_IBWP));
>>>>  
>>>> +	if (pm_active == 1)
>>>> +		pm_runtime_put(unicam->dev);
>>>
>>> As far as I understand, the discussion on v2 concluded there was no need
>>> to test pm_active here. Did I miss anything ?
>>
>> Sorry, I saw the message from Sakari and he was pretty confident on the
>> right way, he even mentioned that all sensors should be fixed, and has
>> not come up with a follow up since.
>> If v2 is the right way, please disregard this v3
> 
> Let's see what Sakari has to say :-)

Hi Sakari,

Could you please let me know whether this v3 is the way you want this to
move forward ?
I have some pending things on top of this. If something is not right let
me know so I can send a v4.

Thanks,
Eugen

> 
>>>> +
>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> base-commit: e98d21c170b01ddef366f023bbfcf6b31509fa83
>>>> change-id: 20260521-bcmpipm-6c578e73239c
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.