Re: [PATCH v2] sched/psi: use __ffs() to walk task-count bitmasks in psi_group_change()
Usama Arif <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:59:39 -0700 Usama Arif <[email protected]> wrote: > psi_group_change() walks the @clear and @set bitmasks to > decrement/increment groupc->tasks[t]. Both masks are at most > NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS (=4) wide and typically have one or two bits > set. Today's form visits every position up to the highest set bit: > > for (t = 0, m = clear; m; m &= ~(1 << t), t++) { > if (!(m & (1 << t))) > continue; > ... > } > > so a mask with only bit 3 set still spins four times through the > skip path. Switch both walks to __ffs() + m &= m-1 form: > > while (clear) { > t = __ffs(clear); > clear &= clear - 1; > ... > } > > which iterates only over the set bits and terminates naturally on > m == 0. m & (m - 1) clears the lowest set bit. This code is easier > to read as well. > > An in-kernel microbench (noinline, same body, IRQs off, pinned CPU > on Zen4c, min-of-10 cyc/call) over mask distributions produced by > common scheduler PSI paths: > > mask pattern old new delta > empty (clear=0x0, set=0x0) 3.68 3.68 +0% > sleep (clear=0x4, set=0x0) 9.60 3.74 -61% > iowait-sleep (clear=0x4, set=0x1) 12.32 4.45 -63% > memstall-sleep (clear=0xc, set=0x0) 11.87 5.54 -53% > wake (clear=0x0, set=0x4) 7.10 3.70 -47% > iowait-wake (clear=0x1, set=0x4) 10.83 4.48 -58% > > Every non-empty case wins 47-63%: old cost tracks the highest set bit > (linear walk), new cost tracks the count of set bits (skip zeros via > TZCNT). Single-bit patterns run at the empty-case floor. > > The generated psi_group_change() text also shrinks by 67 bytes under > -O2 -march=x86-64 (756 -> 689): no scratch register for a "constant 1" > (only __ffs's operand is needed), simpler bit-clear (LEA+AND vs > SHL+NOT+AND after the test), and no skip-if-unset check per position. > > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <[email protected]> Hello Peter! Just wanted to check if there were any comments or feedback on this patch? I checked sched/core branch and didn't see the patch there. Thanks! Usama