Re: [PATCH] locking/csd-lock: Report how long a stuck CSD lock took to recover

Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:51:54AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
>  /*
>   * Complain if too much time spent waiting.  Note that only
>   * the CSD_TYPE_SYNC/ASYNC types provide the destination CPU,
>   * so waiting on other types gets much less information.
>   */
> -static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, int *bug_id, unsigned long *nmessages)
> +static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, u64 *ts_resend,
> +				  int *bug_id, unsigned long *nmessages)

nit: csd_lock_wait_toolong() has too many arguments now to my liking.
This was already a bit awkward before, maybe it is time for a small
clean up. Does it make sense to pack timestamps, bug_id and nmessages
into a struct and pass it around instead?

That could go in as a separate cleanup ahead of this one.

Other than that, it looks reasonable to me.

With or without that:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Ilvokhin <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.