Re: [PATCH net v3] gtp: serialize PDP context updates

Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.network
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Qing Ming <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:20:12 +0800
> PDP contexts can be deleted through GTP_CMD_DELPDP or while the GTP
> network device is being unregistered. The latter is serialized by RTNL,
> but the generic-netlink delete path only holds RCU.
> 
> Running both paths concurrently can therefore make both paths delete the
> same PDP context. The issue was found through static analysis and
> reproduced on a KASAN-enabled kernel by a two-thread program
> racing GTP_CMD_DELPDP against RTM_DELLINK:
> 
>   Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address
>   KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range
>          [0xdead000000000120-0xdead000000000127]
>   RIP: gtp_genl_del_pdp+0x1c1/0x420 [gtp]
>   RBP: dead000000000122
> 
> The second deletion dereferenced the poisoned hlist pprev pointer.
> 
> Serialize PDP context updates with a mutex shared by gtp_pdp_add(),
> gtp_genl_del_pdp(), and gtp_dellink().
> 
> Fixes: 459aa660eb1d ("gtp: add initial driver for datapath of GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP-U)")
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
> Signed-off-by: Qing Ming <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3:
> - Rebase onto net/main.
> 
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
> - Use a dedicated mutex instead of RTNL.
> - Protect PDP add, delete, and link teardown with the same mutex.
> 
>  drivers/net/gtp.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/gtp.c b/drivers/net/gtp.c
> index 9a12cc53da00..8ee516debeed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/gtp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/gtp.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>  
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
>  #include <linux/udp.h>
>  #include <linux/rculist.h>
> @@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ struct gtp_net {
>  };
>  
>  static u32 gtp_h_initval;
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(gtp_pdp_lock);
>  
>  static struct genl_family gtp_genl_family;
>  
> @@ -1555,9 +1557,11 @@ static void gtp_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
>  	struct pdp_ctx *pctx;
>  	int i;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&gtp_pdp_lock);
>  	for (i = 0; i < gtp->hash_size; i++)
>  		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(pctx, next, &gtp->tid_hash[i], hlist_tid)
>  			pdp_context_delete(pctx);
> +	mutex_unlock(&gtp_pdp_lock);
>  
>  	list_del(&gtp->list);
>  	unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, head);
> @@ -1833,6 +1837,8 @@ static struct pdp_ctx *gtp_pdp_add(struct gtp_dev *gtp, struct sock *sk,
>  	__be32 ms_addr;
>  	int family;
>  
> +	guard(mutex)(&gtp_pdp_lock);
> +

Please use the plain mutex_lock() / mutex_unlock().

---8<---
$ cat Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
...
Using device-managed and cleanup.h constructs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Netdev remains skeptical about promises of all "auto-cleanup" APIs,
including even ``devm_`` helpers, historically. They are not the preferred
style of implementation, merely an acceptable one.

Use of ``guard()`` is discouraged within any function longer than 20 lines,
``scoped_guard()`` is considered more readable. Using normal lock/unlock is
still (weakly) preferred.
---8<---
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.