Re: [PATCH v3 05/17] mm/sparse-vmemmap: support section-based vmemmap accounting

Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel.mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 2026/8/4 11:55, Muchun Song wrote:
> section_nr_vmemmap_pages() can account ordinary sections and DAX sections,
> but section-based vmemmap optimization keeps its compound order in struct
> mem_section and retains a different number of vmemmap pages.
>
> Teach section_nr_vmemmap_pages() to recognize section-based optimized
> sections and calculate their vmemmap page count from the section order
> and the HVO retained page count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3:
> - Add vmemmap_optimizable_order() for order-based optimization checks
>
> v2:
> - Remove an unnecessary vmemmap_can_optimize() call to simplify the code
>    (suggested by Mike Rapoport).
> - Rewrite the commit message for better understanding.
> ---
>   include/linux/mmzone.h |  6 ++++--
>   mm/sparse-vmemmap.c    | 10 ++++++----
>   mm/sparse.h            | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 81e16d71e1f0..663726dd6463 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -107,8 +107,10 @@
>   	 is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)) ? \
>   	 MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct page) : 0)
>   
> -/* The number of struct pages covered by the retained vmemmap pages with HVO enabled. */
> -#define VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_STRUCT_PAGES	(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page))
> +/* The number of retained vmemmap pages with HVO enabled. */
> +#define VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_PAGES		1
> +#define VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_STRUCT_PAGES	\
> +	(VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page))
>   #define VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_MIN_ORDER		(ilog2(VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_STRUCT_PAGES) + 1)
>   
>   #define __VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_ORDERS	\
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index 107215cf8488..b7abc5494bb9 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -649,24 +649,26 @@ void offline_mem_sections(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>   static int __meminit section_nr_vmemmap_pages(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>   		struct vmem_altmap *altmap, struct dev_pagemap *pgmap)
>   {
> -	const unsigned int order = pgmap ? pgmap->vmemmap_shift : 0;
> +	const struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> +	const int order = pgmap ? pgmap->vmemmap_shift : section_order(ms);
> +	const int vmemmap_pages = pgmap ? VMEMMAP_RESERVE_NR : VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_PAGES;
>   	const unsigned long pages_per_compound = 1UL << order;
>   
>   	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION));
>   	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_pages > PAGES_PER_SECTION);
>   
> -	if (!vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap))
> +	if (!vmemmap_can_optimize(altmap, pgmap) && !section_vmemmap_optimizable(ms))
>   		return DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages * sizeof(struct page), PAGE_SIZE);

Sashiko said this conditional logic mix DAX and HVO optimization checks in
a way that severely corrupts vmemmap accounting for nr_memmap_pages.

This is a false positive because its premise is based on memory hotplug
support for HVO. However, HVO cannot be enabled through memory hotplug at
this time.

Muchun,
Thanks.
>   
>   	if (order < PFN_SECTION_SHIFT) {
>   		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, pages_per_compound));
> -		return VMEMMAP_RESERVE_NR * nr_pages / pages_per_compound;
> +		return vmemmap_pages * nr_pages / pages_per_compound;
>   	}
>   
>   	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ALIGNED(pfn | nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION));
>   
>   	if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, pages_per_compound))
> -		return VMEMMAP_RESERVE_NR;
> +		return vmemmap_pages;
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.h b/mm/sparse.h
> index b9b6b47e85ce..6ad190ec48cf 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.h
> +++ b/mm/sparse.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,17 @@ static inline bool pfn_vmemmap_optimizable(unsigned long pfn)
>   	return (pfn & (nr_pages - 1)) >= VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_NR_STRUCT_PAGES;
>   }
>   
> +static inline bool vmemmap_optimizable_order(unsigned int order)
> +{
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return order >= VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION_MIN_ORDER;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * mm/sparse.c
>    */
> @@ -80,6 +91,11 @@ static inline void __section_mark_present(struct mem_section *ms,
>   
>   	ms->section_mem_map |= SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT;
>   }
> +
> +static inline bool section_vmemmap_optimizable(const struct mem_section *section)
> +{
> +	return vmemmap_optimizable_order(section_order(section));
> +}
>   #else
>   static inline void sparse_init(void) {}
>   #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.