Re: [PATCH RFC 06/15] mm/mglru: use explicit tier range in read_ctrl_pos()
Baoquan He <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.cgroups,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aoPI0hlFe1uOPeFO@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> |
On 08/04/26 at 03:47am, Kairui Song via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Kairui Song <[email protected]> > > read_ctrl_pos() encodes the tier range in a single "tier" parameter > via "tier % MAX_NR_TIERS" as the start and "min(tier, MAX_NR_TIERS-1)" > as the end. This is hard to follow or maintain or extend. Tier > values 0..3 select a single tier, while tier == MAX_NR_TIERS selects > the full range. > > Replace it with explicit (tier_min, tier_max) parameters using a > half-open [tier_min, tier_max) interval, which is the conventional C > idiom. The call sites become self-documenting: > > - get_tier_idx: (0, 1) for tier 0, (tier, tier+1) for each tier > - get_type_to_scan: (0, MAX_NR_TIERS) for the full range I agree with the complexity, while I am starting to like the original style once I understand it. Maybe add sentences to explain it? Anyway, leave this to other reviewers. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <[email protected]> > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index c2ea92c2b69e..a359d5a1ff41 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -3192,8 +3192,8 @@ struct ctrl_pos { > int gain; > }; > > -static void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int tier, int gain, > - struct ctrl_pos *pos) > +static void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int tier_min, > + int tier_max, int gain, struct ctrl_pos *pos) > { > int i; > struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen; > @@ -3202,7 +3202,7 @@ static void read_ctrl_pos(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type, int tier, int gain, > pos->gain = gain; > pos->refaulted = pos->total = 0; > > - for (i = tier % MAX_NR_TIERS; i <= min(tier, MAX_NR_TIERS - 1); i++) { > + for (i = tier_min; i < tier_max; i++) { > pos->refaulted += lrugen->avg_refaulted[type][i] + > atomic_long_read(&lrugen->refaulted[hist][type][i]); > pos->total += lrugen->avg_total[type][i] + > @@ -4805,9 +4805,9 @@ static int get_tier_idx(struct lruvec *lruvec, int type) > * This value is chosen because any other tier would have at least twice > * as many refaults as the first tier. > */ > - read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, 0, 2, &sp); > + read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, 0, 1, 2, &sp); > for (tier = 1; tier < MAX_NR_TIERS; tier++) { > - read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, tier, 3, &pv); > + read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, tier, tier + 1, 3, &pv); > if (!positive_ctrl_err(&sp, &pv)) > break; > } > @@ -4828,8 +4828,8 @@ static int get_type_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, int swappiness) > * Compare the sum of all tiers of anon with that of file to determine > * which type to scan. > */ > - read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, LRU_GEN_ANON, MAX_NR_TIERS, swappiness, &sp); > - read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, LRU_GEN_FILE, MAX_NR_TIERS, MAX_SWAPPINESS - swappiness, &pv); > + read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, LRU_GEN_ANON, 0, MAX_NR_TIERS, swappiness, &sp); > + read_ctrl_pos(lruvec, LRU_GEN_FILE, 0, MAX_NR_TIERS, MAX_SWAPPINESS - swappiness, &pv); > > return positive_ctrl_err(&sp, &pv); > } > > -- > 2.55.0 > >