Re: [PATCH v5 10/16] nvme-tcp: Use CCR to recover controller that hits an error
Sagi Grimberg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/07/2026 5:23, Mohamed Khalfella wrote: > An alive nvme controller that hits an error now will move to FENCING > state instead of RESETTING state. ctrl->fencing_work attempts CCR to > terminate inflight IOs. Regardless of the success or failure of CCR > operation the controller is transitioned to RESETTING state to continue > error recovery process. > > Signed-off-by: Mohamed Khalfella <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > index ba5c7b3e2a7c..a1711dd1d3c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct nvme_tcp_ctrl { > struct sockaddr_storage src_addr; > struct nvme_ctrl ctrl; > > + struct work_struct fencing_work; > struct work_struct err_work; > struct delayed_work connect_work; > struct nvme_tcp_request async_req; > @@ -605,6 +606,12 @@ static void nvme_tcp_init_recv_ctx(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue) > > static void nvme_tcp_error_recovery(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl) > { > + if (nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_FENCING)) { > + dev_warn(ctrl->device, "starting controller fencing\n"); > + queue_work(nvme_wq, &to_tcp_ctrl(ctrl)->fencing_work); > + return; > + } > + > if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETTING)) > return; > > @@ -2494,12 +2501,29 @@ static void nvme_tcp_reconnect_ctrl_work(struct work_struct *work) > nvme_tcp_reconnect_or_remove(ctrl, ret); > } > > +static void nvme_tcp_fencing_work(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct nvme_tcp_ctrl *tcp_ctrl = container_of(work, > + struct nvme_tcp_ctrl, fencing_work); > + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = &tcp_ctrl->ctrl; > + unsigned long rem; > + > + rem = nvme_fence_ctrl(ctrl); > + if (rem) > + dev_info(ctrl->device, "CCR failed, starting error recovery\n"); > + > + nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_FENCED); > + if (nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETTING)) > + queue_work(nvme_reset_wq, &tcp_ctrl->err_work); > +} > + > static void nvme_tcp_error_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct nvme_tcp_ctrl *tcp_ctrl = container_of(work, > struct nvme_tcp_ctrl, err_work); > struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = &tcp_ctrl->ctrl; > > + flush_work(&to_tcp_ctrl(ctrl)->fencing_work); Agree we shouldn't be here with fencing work running. > if (nvme_tcp_key_revoke_needed(ctrl)) > nvme_auth_revoke_tls_key(ctrl); > nvme_stop_keep_alive(ctrl); > @@ -2542,6 +2566,7 @@ static void nvme_reset_ctrl_work(struct work_struct *work) > container_of(work, struct nvme_ctrl, reset_work); > int ret; > > + flush_work(&to_tcp_ctrl(ctrl)->fencing_work); Isn't it being called in nvme_stop_ctrl? - perhaps it should be called in ->stop_ctrl() callback. Other than that, this looks reasonable to me.