Re: [PATCH] misc: mei: fix race condition between client teardown and read completion

"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <2026082330-saint-relearn-1244@gregkh>
On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 01:26:09PM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> In mei_release(), a host client is torn down upon close(). During this
> teardown sequence, mei_cl_disconnect() is invoked, which releases
> dev->device_lock while waiting for the firmware response.
> 
> If an in-flight read request was previously submitted, an incoming
> completion interrupt processed concurrently by the MEI interrupt
> handler can add a completed callback into cl->rd_completed via
> mei_cl_add_rd_completed().
> 
> Because mei_cl_flush_queues(cl, NULL) was invoked before mei_cl_unlink(cl),
> an incoming completion callback can slip into cl->rd_completed after the
> flush has completed but before the client is unlinked from dev->file_list.
> When mei_cl_unlink() is subsequently called, the invariant check at
> drivers/misc/mei/client.c:698 triggers:
> 
>   WARN_ON(!list_empty(&cl->rd_completed) ||
>           !list_empty(&cl->rd_pending) ||
>           !list_empty(&cl->link));
> 
> Call trace:
>   WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 5056 at drivers/misc/mei/client.c:698 mei_cl_unlink+0xaa/0x140 [mei]
>   RIP: 0010:mei_cl_unlink+0xaa/0x140 [mei]
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    mei_release+0x202/0x270 [mei]
>    __fput+0x105/0x2e0
>    __x64_sys_close+0x90/0x140
>    do_syscall_64+0xaa/0x660
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
>    </TASK>
> 
> Immediately following mei_cl_unlink(), mei_release() calls kfree(cl).
> If any remaining or deferred callback references the freed client, a
> use-after-free occurs.
> 
> Fix this by flushing queues after unlinking the client from dev->file_list
> inside mei_cl_unlink(), preventing concurrent IRQ completions from
> populating the client's completed queue during teardown.
> 
> Reported-by: Nirbhay Kumar <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Nirbhay Kumar <[email protected]>

No need for Reported-by as you authored and signed off on this.

And did you forget an Assisted-by: tag?

and what commit id does this fix?

Also, no need to attach this at all, just send it using git send-email
as-is.

thanks,

greg k-h
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.