Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Defer sched domain rebuild to common unlock path
Ridong Chen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.cgroups,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/18/2026 6:27 PM, Guopeng Zhang wrote: > From: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng-UOlijcLmZ/[email protected]> > > Both callers of update_prstate(), cpuset_partition_write() and > cpuset_css_killed(), call cpuset_update_sd_hk_unlock() immediately > afterwards. That helper rebuilds sched domains when force_sd_rebuild is > set before releasing the cpuset locks, so the check in update_prstate() > is redundant. > > Commit 3bfe47967191 ("cgroup/cpuset: Move > housekeeping_update()/rebuild_sched_domains() together") removed the > same check from cpuset_write_resmask(). Remove the remaining one from > update_prstate(). > > Signed-off-by: Guopeng Zhang <zhangguopeng-UOlijcLmZ/[email protected]> > --- > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > index 8f24171..d58ecf5 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > @@ -3039,8 +3039,6 @@ out: > update_partition_sd_lb(cs, old_prs); > > notify_partition_change(cs, old_prs); > - if (force_sd_rebuild) > - rebuild_sched_domains_locked(); > free_tmpmasks(&tmpmask); > return 0; > } This title is confusing. I thought you were doing some async work, what does "defer" mean here? In fact, it just removes a piece of redundant code. -- Best regards Ridong