[leaf-commits] src/bering-uclibc4/source/busybox buildtool.mk, 1.4, 1.5
KP Kirchd?rfer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.leaf.cvs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Update of /cvsroot/leaf/src/bering-uclibc4/source/busybox In directory sfp-cvsdas-2.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30920 Modified Files: buildtool.mk Log Message: fix copy to etc/init.d and etc/default Index: buildtool.mk =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/leaf/src/bering-uclibc4/source/busybox/buildtool.mk,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -C2 -d -r1.4 -r1.5 *** buildtool.mk 2 Oct 2010 12:36:27 -0000 1.4 --- buildtool.mk 4 Oct 2010 05:16:26 -0000 1.5 *************** *** 32,40 **** $(BT_STRIP) $(BT_STRIP_BINOPTS) $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/busybox cp -a $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/busybox $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR) ! cp -a ntpd $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/init.d cp -a ntpd.default $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/default/ntpd cp -a $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/* $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/bin ! cp -a $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/init.d/* $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/etc/init.d ! cp -a $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/default/* $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/etc/default touch $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/.build --- 32,40 ---- $(BT_STRIP) $(BT_STRIP_BINOPTS) $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/busybox cp -a $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/busybox $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR) ! cp -a ntpd $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/init.d/ntpd cp -a ntpd.default $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/default/ntpd cp -a $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/* $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/bin ! cp -a $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/init.d/* $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/etc/init.d/ ! cp -a $(BUSYBOX_BUILD_DIR)/etc/default/* $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/etc/default/ touch $(BUSYBOX_DIR)/.build ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d