Re: 5.2 branch kernel update

kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Organization none
Message-ID <1917232.yOuMbq0cBN@stalker>
Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 20:15:52 schrieb Andrew:
> Ok. 3.18 will bring some very useful things (like overlayfs), but it is
> mostly for experiments with embedded resource-limited platforms, not a
> showstopper.

Maybe without showstoppers..., but then it can be introduced in next, and 5.2 
will have a short time to live.

kp

> 
> 07.04.2015 18:31, kp kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Hi Andrew;
> > 
> > Am Dienstag, 7. April 2015, 17:57:53 schrieb Andrew:
> >> Hi all.
> >> 
> >> Maybe we should switch on 5.2 brach to 3.18 LTS kernel?
> > 
> > I had the same idea, but refused even to test 3.18 because of three
> > reasons.
> > 
> > 1) it takes some time (a few weeks) to adjust the main images to a new
> > kernel and to review the kernel settings
> > 
> > 2) although support for unusual tarballs like the raspberry pi has been
> > improved I expect it takes somewhat longer to get a working tarball again
> > 
> > 3) I expect a major change in my infrastructure next week and expect
> > breakages which will take a while to resolve and therefor time working on
> > real new stuff will be limited at least
> > 
> > Summarizing this, I epxect 5.2 would be moved a few months into the
> > future,
> > while 5.2 with 3.14 can be considered stable IMHO.
> > 
> > My proposal is to release a rc-candidate RSN, and to start working on a
> > 3.18 in the next branch, which will then be 5.3. The lifetime for 5.2
> > could be really short then.
> > 
> > Another idea is to update uClibc as well
> > 
> > see:
> >   http://www.uclibc-ng.org/trac/wiki
> > 
> > I've tried to build a toolchain, but it fails not seeing the
> > linux-headers.
> > I'm not shure, what causes the issue, because they seems to be at expected
> > place. Maybe you can take an eye on it?
> > 
> > kp
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---- BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> > Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> > Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
> > exercises
> > http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-> > event?utm_
> > source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > leaf-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
> 
> _______________________________________________
> leaf-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.