Re: kernel config and revision control
Erich Titl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.leaf.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 17.04.2015 um 12:12 schrieb Andrew: > Hi. > It sounds good - it'll simplify maintenance. > But IMHO we should leave kernel major/minor versions - just because we > may have different kernel versions for different platforms in future > (for ex., some SoC may require specified kernel version for Soc-related > patches). The versions numbers are still _inside_ the config files and in the name of the kernel tarball. Right now the Bering version is more or less linked to a certain kernel release and I don't think it makes sense to change that. cheers ET ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 1.9 KB) - not displayed