Re: kernel config and revision control

Erich Titl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 17.04.2015 um 12:12 schrieb Andrew:
> Hi.
> It sounds good - it'll simplify maintenance.
> But IMHO we should leave kernel major/minor versions - just because we 
> may have different kernel versions for different platforms in future 
> (for ex., some SoC may require specified kernel version for Soc-related 
> patches).

The versions numbers are still _inside_ the config files and in the name
of the kernel tarball. Right now the Bering version is more or less
linked to a certain kernel release and I don't think it makes sense to
change that.

cheers

ET

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF


_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 1.9 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.