Re: 5.2.saving modules problem

Erich Titl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi KP

Am 30.07.2015 um 19:18 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
....

>
> As I said above, default should be seamless.

How would you do that? Îf there are any parameters needed, they have to 
be introduced. What about upgrading systems on the fly, do you really 
want to massage leaf.cfg? I for myself dont.

>
>>> The code to save to and use moddb isn't really working yet, at least for
>>> me. But I think we should have that ready when releasing the next rc with
>>> modules.sqfs insteasd of modules.tgz.
>>
>> To me it does not make a difference if it is a tgz file or sqfs, I won't
>> use it anyway except for upgrade and then be done with it. I prefer
>> moddb.lrp. I don't like the idea of a parameter because it adds complexity.
>
> The implementation in 5.2 will be pretty straightforward even for small, but
> nowadays common boxes  with more than 32MB of storage.
> To support still smaller/older systems (or to speedup boot) adding code to
> save and use moddb is all I'm asking for.

There should be no code needed, just discard the changes to apkg, it did 
not know about this in the past and IMHO it should not care where the 
modules came from, just save them.

Ahhhh.... btw. could you please try to test build_upgrade and add the 
files it is complaining about, if any. I have no way to test for another 
few months.

cheers

Erich

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 1.9 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.