Re: http server

kp kirchdoerfer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.leaf.devel
Organization none
Message-ID <2660251.87cx7aKHll@stalker>
Hi Erich;

Am Sonntag, 10. Januar 2016, 11:18:09 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
> 
> Am 10.01.2016 um 08:40 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer:
> > Am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016, 00:26:57 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >> 
> >> ...
> >> * update lighttpd to 1.4.39
> >> 
> >> Is there a benefit in using lighthttpd over mini_httpd? If so, should we
> >> drop mini_httpd?
> > 
> > While it's still small it's more like a full-fledged webserver and more
> > configuration options.
> 
> What is the footprint, They pretend it is 'small'

About 100kb more than mini_httpd, depends also on included modules.

> > In the long-term we may replace mini-httpd, but this requires some qorjk
> > to
> > migrate webconf.
> 
> Details? If it supports some kind of CGI is should just work.

I believe we need to adjust install pathes and look into the configuration as 
well. Though I haven't looked into it seriously.

kp

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.