Re: dnsmasq dhcp failure
Erich Titl <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:00:28 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.leaf.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Marko Am 29.08.2022 um 00:31 schrieb marko via leaf-user: > Hi ET, > > I have run leaf for a very long time, normally on fast hardware with plenty of > memory. > > I've never seen dnsmasq not serve requests or allocate leases. Well, it looks like it on mine and with the little traffic I am running I guess it cannot just be hardware as at least to one of these systems I can still reach it from the net even when internally it appears frozen. > > I think dnsmasq fits the smaller network that is a bit complex scenario very > well. Making it more complex would be a mistake as would making it more like > commodity routers which have many functions now. Typically the *X way would be to use small tools which fit just one purpose. Dnsmasq deviates from this principle. I moved to dnsmasq a few years ago for probably the same reasons you present here. And I agree as long as it is doing its duty it is a nice albeit a bit complicated tool to configure. Thanks ET ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
OpenPGP_signature
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B) - not displayed