Re: Leaf 7.2.1 lighttpd certificate missing or invalid
Timothy Wegner <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Apr 2023 09:41:03 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.leaf.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFLr275pxfZuyFd9554ipAgVSaK=Yw9G4NDYU4heR_a0Q5bAAA@mail.gmail.com> |
Erich, I only renamed the very old lighttpd certificate as a test. I gave it a different extension. After a save and reboot, the warning message was gone, and a new certificate with the leaf distribution date appeared, so I deleted the bad certificate, saved, and rebooted. No more warning messages. Several lessons learned here. One is to pay attention to boot messages - I had missed the lighthtp bad certificate for the past five years! Tim On Wed, Apr 5, 2023, 6:36 AM Erich Titl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 04.04.2023 um 18:50 schrieb Timothy Wegner: > > Erich and list, > > > > I apologise to everyone, I discovered that my lighttpd certificate > problem > > was very long standing and caused by myself. There is no problem with the > > leaf distribution. Kp and I discussed this off-list, and I never reported > > the resolution of this to the list. Here's a quote from my last message > to > > kp: > > > >>> > > ... all I had to do to fix the lighttpd certificate problem was rename > > /etc/ssl/private/lighttpd.pem to something else, save, and reboot. Then > all > > was well, and the correct pem file got copied to two places. This is > > embarrassing, but the bad lighttpd.pem file had a timestamp of April 2 > > 2018!!!!! Yikes! I've been getting that error message for five years!! > >>> > > Mhhh... just changing the name of the certificate file does not make > much sense to me. Are you using https? If so then the default path to > the certificate file would be '/etc/ssl/private/lighttpd.pem'. The CA > signing certificate would be > 'etc/ssl/certs/LEAF_Bering_CA_certificate.pem'. > > These files are used for https only. > > Which place(s) is the renamed certificate file copied to so it is > reloaded from configdb and why would such a copy change the behaviour of > lighttpd without touching the lighttpd configuration? > > In my configuration lighttpd does not start at all if the certificate > file is renamed. > > > > > Let me add that my (too lazy) method of updating Leaf for many years has > > been to copy configdb.lrp and leaf.cfg from my previous working copy. I > am > > long overdue for a major configdb.lrp cleanup! > > If you dropped mhttp for lighttpd then the old certificate files would > still linger in /etc for at least one save operation, but this should > not interfere with lighttpd unless you are starting both instances. Make > sure you only load one http daemon. > > cheers > > ET > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/