| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.lfs.automated |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On 8/26/23 04:14, Pierre Labastie ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing
List) wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-08-26 at 01:55 +0000, super1337 wrote:
>> Greetings, everyone!
[snip]
>> 5) while the build script is running, it's very clear which package
>> is
>> being built, and how long it's been running. Personally, I'd like to
>> see
>> something of the following nature:
>> ____a) after the ch5 binutils SBU has been time'd, the other handfull
>> of
>> the toolchain lists the first SBU time - and does the math for the
>> approximate build time of {current} package
>> ____b) each of the handful of the toolchain is also time'd
>> ____c) when ch5 is complete, the SBU is re-calculated
>> ____d) moving though chapters 6,7, and 8 the SBU value and
>> approximate
>> build time is displayed using the recalculated average of all of ch5
>> Benefit being here is to hopefully have a more accurate SBU
>> presented,
>> and to give the impatient human behind the screen a very reasonable
>> estimation of when to come back and check on things.
>>
>
> I think a) + d) would be a useful addition: displaying the estimated
> time based on book's SBU figures, knowing the base (standard) SBU from
> binutils-pass1. For b) and c), I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
> The base SBU is only from binutils pass 1 and cannot be recalculated
> from other packages in chapter 5.
My most recent log says it takes 121 SBU with all tests at -j4. On my system with
the current tool chain, the SBU time is 110 seconds, so that is a little under 4 hours.
To see more detail check out, for instance,
https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/12.0-rc1/AMD3900X/r11.3-207+-SBU_DU-2023-08-13.report.
There are several other systems with similar reports in the parent directory.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/alfs-discuss
Unsubscribe: See the above information page