Re: commit 8a796f8f is breaking a usecase

"Pierre Labastie" ([email protected] via alfs-discuss Mailing List) <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:20:24 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.automated
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2025-12-08 at 01:35 +0800, Zhang Wen wrote:
> The commit 8a796f8f is breaking a usecase like this:
> Firstly, select only LFS in jhalfs, and build the new system.
> Then, select BLFS in jhalfs and try to build some base dependencies
> for the new system.

Sorry for the delay, this message went to SPAM on my computer...
I'm sorry (too) if I broke a use case, but I'm not sure what you are
doing exactly after first building the base LFS system:
- boot the new system then run jhalfs (how is it installed on the new
system?) on it and select BLFS book? In this case some dependencies are
missing (docbook, git, etc), aren't they?
- enter chroot then run jhalfs (same question) and select BLFS book?
That would be the same problem
- rerun jhalfs on host, and select BLFS book? That would install the
blfs tools on host...

Oh, maybe you just run jhalfs on host, select the blfs tools and
deselect "rebuild files", so that, the $(MOUNT_PT)/jhalfs dir still
exists, but the Makefile is changed?

I hope you can answer this. Meanwhile, I'll test the last scenario.

Regards
Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/alfs-discuss
Unsubscribe: See the above information page