Re: [lfs-dev] LFS Live-CD Project
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel,gmane.linux.lfs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024-12-07 12:10, Thomas Trepl wrote: > Sure, managing a Live-CD is a good amount of effort. > > But i think here it is not yet defined to which extend the CD should > go. I > assume the idea to reanimate the LFS-CD is kind of fresh, so it might > not > yet sure whether all the stuff (X, Xfce, I18n, etc...) should be on it > or > not. > Or it might be a bare minimal CD providing an OS with which LFS can be > built, maybe with the book, the sources and a text browser on it. That's a good idea, we can cut down the work significantly by only building for stable releases if we want to do a pre-built ISO. Once we go into package lock it won't be much trouble to actually build it. > It could also be a project only telling how to build a CD which is > bootable > here and there and what is to be done and when to get there. LFS > wouldn't > need to maintain their own CD (while it would be a nice service for the > users). This would then give the user the opportunity to maintain their > own > CDs. > I think I like this idea the most, IMHO the old LiveCD didn't really do a good job of showing how LiveCD's actually work. And AFAICS there is no other source on the internet that comprehensively covers how to make a LiveCD work, especially with EFI (wasn't even around back when the original was released). Case in point it took me about a solid 3-4 weeks of scouring through the internet three years ago to figure out how to do it for another project of mine. > And thanks for the link. It shows how well equiped the LFS-CD was in > those > days. -- Rahul -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page