Re: References to old versions in sed explanations

"Ken Moffat" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 02:26:08AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:49:57PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > On 2/14/25 3:55 PM, Ken Moffat ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) wrote:
> > > I'm slowly working through my scripts, hoping to get a partially useful
> > > desktop system for TL2025 (binary) pretest although at the moment
> > > the omens do not look good. Anyway, I got to fluxbox and saw:
> > > 
> > > First, fix a build failure when building with gcc-11.1
> > > 
> > > I *could* interpret that as 'no longer needed' but it is still in
> > > the book for gcc-14 and worked on my last build, so I propose that
> > > explanations with a package version should say 'or later'. Many
> > > already do, maybe this is just one of those things that has slipped
> > > through.
> > > 
> > > For gcc, similar text for gcc-14 for libcddb, gtksourceview and gs
> > > (ghostscript). The latter actually says 'with gcc-14 and libidn' so
> > > maybe a libidn version or later should go there. The ghostscript
> > > entry seems to have come in between BLFS-12.1 and BLFS-12.2,
> > > probably for gcc-10.03-series, so gcc-14 or later and libidn-1.42 or
> > > later. (Obviously, gcc-14 is current at the moment so those messages
> > > do not look odd.)
> > > 
> > > Also, in itstool
> > > 
> > > First, fix some compatibility problems with Python-3.12
> > > 
> > > I can fix these if people wish, but maybe I'm overthinking it ?
> > 
> > We are going through all the packages now for BLFS-12.3.  If there is a left
> > over fix that is not needed any more, we need to remove those.  If it's just
> > a text issue and need to add 'and later', go ahead.
> > 
> >   -- Bruce
> > 
> 
> The ghostscript match was a false positive, commented out with a
> note it was fixed in 10.04.0
> 
> Fluxbox, libcddb, gtksourceview seem still needed.
> 
> itstool is not a *build* failure, it spews output at runtime:
> https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/18664#comment:14
> https://github.com/itstool/itstool/pull/51 is still open,
> I think the maintainers (ubuntu?) have given up on it.
> 
> Will update these four to 'or later' in the next day or two, unless
> anyone objects.
> 

Also vorbis-tools.  All done in r12.2-1305 g156c21fb607a.

ĸen
-- 
 The three certainties in computing: BGP errors, DNS failures,
 incorrect time/date functions, and off-by-one errors.

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.