| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 09:51:14PM -0500, William Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 19:49:46 -0500
> "\"Douglas R. Reno\"" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Good evening,
> >
> >
> > While I've been working on GCC 15 fixes, I have been struggling with
> > procmail a bit. For now the temporary workaround I will put into place
> > is to tell CC to use -std=gnu17, which is similar to what Fedora is
> > doing. However, I want to consider dropping this package if it's not
> > properly resolved before the release of BLFS 12.4. The package has not
> > had any commits made in 3 years.
> >
> > What does everyone think?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > - Doug
> >
>
> Hello Doug,
>
> I've used procmail for a couple decades.
>
> Was curious what we'd use as an MDA if removing procmail, there is fdm.
>
> Arch, and maybe other distros will maintain procmail patches.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Harrington
If I was still building and maintaining systems I would be using
procmail. Looking at fedora, in January 2023 they switched to a
github fork. In January 2024 they patched that for gcc-14.
https://github.com/BuGlessRB/procmail
although the gcc-14 patch hasn't gone upstream and there might be an
issue with gcc-15:
https://github.com/BuGlessRB/procmail/issues/10
ĸen
--
Dibbler had worked out that with enough fried onions and mustard
people would eat anything. -- Sir Pterry, 'Moving Pictures'
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page