Re: [lfs-dev] Moving packages from/to BLFS to/from LFS

"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel,gmane.linux.lfs.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 2025-09-04 at 09:44 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:

> > libxml2: It's not strictly necessary for LFS, but there are 64 references
> >    to it in BLFS.
> 
> The problem is we need to build it with ICU to satisfy QtWebEngine, but
> ICU is rather heavy.  If we don't move ICU too we can only "copy"
> libxml2, not moving it.
> 
> The point I want to move sqlite is to avoid rebuilding Python 3 in BLFS,
> and I don't want to make libxml2 yet another package we have to
> rebuild...

I just rechecked the stat of ICU and it's only 0.5 + 1.8 SBU.  Not so
heavy as I'd remembered...

So maybe we'd go with

icu
libxml2
libarchive
sqlite

Note that gettext can use libxml2 too.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.