Re: [lfs-dev] Moving packages from/to BLFS to/from LFS
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel,gmane.linux.lfs.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 04.09.25 um 21:39 schrieb Thomas Trepl: > Am Donnerstag, dem 04.09.2025 um 21:07 +0200 schrieb Rainer Fiebig: >> Am 04.09.25 um 21:00 schrieb Thomas Trepl ([email protected] >> via lfs-dev Mailing List): >>> Am Donnerstag, dem 04.09.2025 um 12:30 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs: >>>> I'm removing the discussion to keep this post to a reasonable level. See the previous >>>> posts in the thread to review the context. >>>> >>> That's a pretty good idea - the latest answers do not deserve any further >>> comments. >> Rather arrogant attitude. > > well, we just learned that the classification of a dependency as optional > or recommended depends on the amount of users who want to use the feature. > I do not comment any further to that one. If you think thats arrogant - > then I love to be arrogant^2. Sorry, I don't get it. The latest posts before yours were Rahul's and mine. Rahul made a case for introducing make-ca and wget/curl. I took a user's perspective and made a case for keeping LFS lean. I can't see anything unworthy of discussion in any of them. Rainer -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page