Re: prefer nodump role for the doc insturction on libxml2

"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Oct 2025 23:33:47 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:32 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:22 +0800, Zhang Wen wrote:
> > With the doc role, libxml2 tries to build doc without the needed
> > dependencies when building with jhalfs. The nodump role can fix this.
> 
> We use the "doc" role instead of the "nodump" role.
> 
> If someone wants to spend time on jhalfs we can use this attribute for
> the optional dependencies required for doc as well, and make jhalfs to
> build the doc if the dependencies are installed (or pull the
> dependencies in if the user requests the doc).

We already have role="doc" in the book but it is silently ignored,
because jhalfs wants remap="doc".

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page