Re: prefer nodump role for the doc insturction on libxml2
"Xi Ruoyao" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Oct 2025 23:33:47 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:32 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:22 +0800, Zhang Wen wrote: > > With the doc role, libxml2 tries to build doc without the needed > > dependencies when building with jhalfs. The nodump role can fix this. > > We use the "doc" role instead of the "nodump" role. > > If someone wants to spend time on jhalfs we can use this attribute for > the optional dependencies required for doc as well, and make jhalfs to > build the doc if the dependencies are installed (or pull the > dependencies in if the user requests the doc). We already have role="doc" in the book but it is silently ignored, because jhalfs wants remap="doc". -- Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page