Re: prefer nodump role for the doc insturction on libxml2

On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:33 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:32 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> > On Sun, 2025-10-19 at 23:22 +0800, Zhang Wen wrote:
> > > With the doc role, libxml2 tries to build doc without the needed
> > > dependencies when building with jhalfs. The nodump role can fix
> > > this.
> > 
> > We use the "doc" role instead of the "nodump" role.
> > 
> > If someone wants to spend time on jhalfs we can use this attribute
> > for
> > the optional dependencies required for doc as well, and make jhalfs
> > to
> > build the doc if the dependencies are installed (or pull the
> > dependencies in if the user requests the doc).
> 
> We already have role="doc" in the book but it is silently ignored,
> because jhalfs wants remap="doc".

Oops! I often tell people should look at the template before editing
the book. This applies to myself too!

Pierre

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page