Re: Help with lvm2 tests.
"Pierre Labastie" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Oct 2025 08:01:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2025-10-27 at 20:09 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 10/27/25 3:12 PM, Joe Locash ([email protected] via blfs-dev > Mailing List) wrote: > > On 10/27/25 3:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs ([email protected] via > > blfs-dev Mailing > > List) wrote: > > > I was trying to update to lvm2-LVM2.2.03.36 today but I got a lot > > > of test errors > > > that I can't figure out: > > > > > > # 443 tests: 6 passed, 236 skipped, 0 timed out, 0 warned, 201 > > > failed in 1:38.219 > > > > > > Can I get someone else to check this out please. > > > > > > -- Bruce > > > > > > Here is an example of the output for one failure: > > [snip] > > > I see the same thing: > > [snip] > > > ### 443 tests: 6 passed, 239 skipped, 0 timed out, 0 warned, 198 > > failed in 2:17.432 > > I make a little progress. I thought I has all the appropriate kernel > configuration > settings in place, but a review of the lvm2 page showed that I missed > some. I now have: > > ### 443 tests: 155 passed, 247 skipped, 0 timed out, 1 warned, 40 > failed in 13:52.880 > > And I loked some more and found that I didn't have all the mdadm > kernel modules > built. Adding those I now have: > > ### 443 tests: 330 passed, 86 skipped, 0 timed out, 1 warned, 26 > failed in 32:10.559 > > The tests also seem to want reiserfs and scsi_debug modules. I > looked at the > directory test/results and tried to look at the files there. However > there are 314K > lines spread out over 445 files. Trying to find the 26 failed files > is not obvious. > > Overall I'm not sure how to address this in the book and am looking > for ideas. We already make some provision in the book: "The tests do not implement the “expected fail” possibility, and a small number of test failures is expected by upstream. More failures may happen because some kernel options are missing." I guess 26 failures out of 360 or so is acceptable in this context. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page