Re: Renaming Patches

On 11/28/25 12:26 PM, Randy McMurchy ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing 
List) wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Noted in recent commits that the Spidermonkey patch was renamed to proper
> conventions, then the next day, the patch was renamed by a different
> editor back to the incorrect convention.
> 
> Seems like a waste of time to me.

The reason I renamed the FF patch was because it do not match what was in the patch 
command.  It looks like it was renamed back and everything is now named consistently.

It's unusual that we have two pages for the same base tarball with different names.
That makes things a little confusing.

I would have done things a little differently, but I'm OK with how things are now.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page