Re: sendmail
"\"Douglas R. Reno\"" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Dec 2025 22:42:23 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/27/25 10:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) wrote: > We got notified about a new point release of sendmail-8.18.2 tonight. > It's the first new release in two years. > > I'm wondering if we should drop it from BLFS. It's been around since > 1983 and is fairly challenging to configure. I do have an O'Reilly > book on it -- 3rd edition, Copyright 2003. It's 1200 pages long > counting the index. It refers to version 8.11.3. > > We also have exim and postfix in the book and in my opinion that > should be sufficient. > > Thoughts? > > -- Bruce I'm the one who normally maintains sendmail for us, but I wouldn't be opposed to dropping it if everyone is in favor. I would however prefer to at least keep Exim, as postfix is a bit overkill for local mail delivery! Sendmail definitely is challenging to configure, and it would save me a couple hours every tagging cycle. - Doug -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page