Re: libcupsfilters: mupdf not "Required"
"Rainer Fiebig" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Mon, 2 Feb 2026 13:31:14 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 18.12.25 um 17:54 schrieb Bruce Dubbs ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List): > On 12/18/25 4:25 AM, Rainer Fiebig ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing > List) wrote: >> Am 06.12.25 um 21:40 schrieb Bruce Dubbs ([email protected] via >> blfs-dev Mailing List): >>> On 12/6/25 10:31 AM, Rainer Fiebig ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing >>> List) wrote: >>>> Am 06.12.25 um 17:09 schrieb Rainer Fiebig ([email protected] via >>>> blfs-dev >>>> Mailing List): >>>>> Mupdf is labeled as "Required" for libcupsfilters. However, >>>>> libcupsfilters-2.1.1 can be built without mupdf, using the >>>>> config-option >>>>> >>>>> --disable-mutool >>>>> >>>>> I just did so and the build was fine, including the tests. >>>>> >>>>> So I suggest do downgrade mupdf to "Recommended" or perhaps even >>>>> "Optional" for libcupsfilters. / snip / >> But this is not an urgent matter and perhaps you may allow me more time >> for final testing once I have that Seagate-problem solved. Such things >> always happen when you need them least. Thanks. > > Sure. We can implement your suggestions when you are satisfied with what > should be done. Perhaps poppler should be demoted to recommended also. > > -- Bruce I was just about restarting work on this when I read that bombshell-news about dropped support for SysV. What an unfortunate and blatantly wrong decision! Very disappointing and demotivating. To me it seems pointless now to contribute to this project anymore. So I drop out of this thread here. And this will be one of the very rare occasions where I did not conclude what I had started. Thanks for your work and efforts! Rainer -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page