Re: [blfs-book] [blfs] branch trunk updated: glycin: Fix order of operations.
"Zeckma" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Feb 2026 19:32:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALia6dg53ny_w32nMuC7EvHuitXyDcuyXZ6-PLR3pNsKaWtTKw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 6:01 PM Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> wrote: > Why the order was wrong? > > With your "fixed" order the build now fails: > > error: no matching package named `image-extras` found > location searched: directory source > `/home/xry111/sources/12.5/glycin-2.0.8/vendor` (which is replacing > registry `crates-io`) I had a few reasons for believing that what I pushed was correct. I was in Lynx so it's hard to discern a note from normal text. I was also in a rush. So I skipped the first patch but wanted to apply the second patch. But with the current order, that failed because the patch tries to modify files that aren't there, which the cargo vendor command fixes. I now realize that the note was there that says the second patch relies on the first one to be applied, along with its `cargo vendor` command. That being said, I don't particularly like the layout of how it was. But it is suitable. We could set up some conditions potentially so the first set of commands don't have to be ran. For me, I only applied the XPM patch, then ran `cargo vendor`, and the build succeeded for me. So I thought everything was okay when it wasn't. I reverted the commit so we can potentially revisit it with a better solution. Sorry for pushing a bad commit and thanks for letting me know. - Zeckma -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page