Re: update vim to 9.2.0161 (i know editors are supposed to do that, but someone totally forgot to update it)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1774065217-9429-17584
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday, March 16th, 2026 at 23:48, Zeckma <[email protected]=
ch.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/16/26 17:36, Hotdog wrote:
>  > i sent this in blfs-dev, not lfs-dev
>  > check the BLFS book vim is outdated
>=20
> My bad, I keep forgetting Vim is also in BLFS.=20
> ...

Easy mistake to make.

I know it's been discounted, for a number of different reasons,
on a few occasions over the years, but this issue should remind=20
us that it is a bit of a shame that the LFS and BLFS Books still
aren't being developed within, and rendered from, the same XML
source tree, and appear as parts of a Set of Books.=20

Funnily enough, I have just seen a posting, on the systemd from
scratch list, where Bruce postulates moving a couple of packages
from the systemd from scratch Book into the BLFS Book, but notes=20
that there'd be a lot of work to fix up the ID/XREF space, whereby
references between the two standalone books are currently made via
a URI targeting a "view" in the other Book's online rendering.

Always thought it was a bit perverse that, even if one had downloaded
both the LFS and BLFS Books, switching between content in them required
one to have an internet connection to the website.


------------=_1774065217-9429-17584
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0

-- 
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
------------=_1774065217-9429-17584--