Re: Hi, I'm back (somehow)
"Pierre Scotney" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Wed, 27 May 2026 18:38:59 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ahato5h184LnONYo@tanglefoot> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1779871204-1253-32815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 05:14:40AM +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote: > Hi all > > Forgive my recent silence as an editor of LFS/BLFS, this was almost > exclusively down to professional matters (I got laid off by the company), > I'm still fully behind the idea, goals and general management of LFS/BLFS. > > However, as those of you knowing me probably assumed, I'm of course totally > and unequivocally against the recently made decision of dropping SYSV > support in LFS/BLFS. > > But as I was not of any help at the time of the decision, I naturally have > to accept it, I had the chance to object, but didn't take it, my bad. > > I have now decided to go on like this: I will maintain a separate fork of > LFS/BLFS at my home, for anybody that does not want to submit to systemd as > being the only way to run a self-created Linux system. > > Because I don't, and I never will. And if it's just because this bloated > piece of garbage was provably shoved down everybody's throat by a provably > lying and manipulative former employee of Red Had and now Microsoft, with > the very clearly stated goal of driving non-compliant UNIX's out of > business. > > I cannot be part of that, sorry, I'm too moral for this. > > But I still hope that my sysv fork and Xi Ruoyao's mainline can maintain a > friendly partnership. I just would like LFS to point to a choice outside of > Poetteringverse. It's much nicer there. > > > Bye > Tim Hello Tim, Welcome back. I am sorry to hear about your professional situation, I hope things have/are working out for you regarding employment. I too was disappointed by the decision to drop SysV init due to GNOME and KDE requiring SystemD. Personally, I don't use either desktop environment, but as GNU/Linux is about freedom of choice, I appreciate their existence. I will keeping using OpenRC, Wayland, Swaywm, Foot and all my tty based apps, which I build from the install scripts of SysV LFS/BLFS and other community based distros. I also keep a watch on the progress of GNU/Hurd, due to the continued commercialisation of SystemD/Linux, and hope one day it will be a viable alternative. I like the possibility of open hardware platforms based on the RISC-V ISA. Keep up the great work as an LFS/BLFS editor and providing an alternative build path for GNU/Linux users. Regards Pierre ------------=_1779871204-1253-32815 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page ------------=_1779871204-1253-32815--