Re: Hi, I'm back (somehow)
"Pierre Scotney" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> Wed, 27 May 2026 21:42:47 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ahbYt4NfHHNN8hYa@tanglefoot> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1779882230-1253-32883 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 06:37:29AM -0500, William Harrington wrote: > On Wed, 27 May 2026 05:14:40 +0200 > "Tim Tassonis" ([email protected] via blfs-dev Mailing List) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > Forgive my recent silence as an editor of LFS/BLFS, this was almost > > exclusively down to professional matters (I got laid off by the > > company), I'm still fully behind the idea, goals and general management > > of LFS/BLFS. > > > > However, as those of you knowing me probably assumed, I'm of course > > totally and unequivocally against the recently made decision of dropping > > SYSV support in LFS/BLFS. > > > > But as I was not of any help at the time of the decision, I naturally > > have to accept it, I had the chance to object, but didn't take it, my bad. > > > > I have now decided to go on like this: I will maintain a separate fork > > of LFS/BLFS at my home, for anybody that does not want to submit to > > systemd as being the only way to run a self-created Linux system. > > > > Because I don't, and I never will. And if it's just because this bloated > > piece of garbage was provably shoved down everybody's throat by a > > provably lying and manipulative former employee of Red Had and now > > Microsoft, with the very clearly stated goal of driving non-compliant > > UNIX's out of business. > > > > I cannot be part of that, sorry, I'm too moral for this. > > > > But I still hope that my sysv fork and Xi Ruoyao's mainline can maintain > > a friendly partnership. I just would like LFS to point to a choice > > outside of Poetteringverse. It's much nicer there. > > > > > > Bye > > Tim > > > > Greetings Tim, > > No matter what happens, I've been through the ringer, too, many times. > I dusted off the old Dual Pentium II, next to the Pentium, 486 and 386. > > Dusted my eyes off and remembered that I had LFS 5.1.x on the machines and figured the turmoil we had back then. After that was the GCC3 to GCC4 days, a whole slew of situations. Hang in there the best that you can. > > Sincerely, > > William Harrington Hello William, That's some classic hardware! Good to hear it is still in good use. Regards Pierre ------------=_1779882230-1253-32883 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/sympa/info/blfs-dev Unsubscribe: See the above information page ------------=_1779882230-1253-32883--